Danger to press freedom

[av_one_full first min_height=” vertical_alignment=” space=” custom_margin=” margin=’0px’ padding=’0px’ border=” border_color=” radius=’0px’ background_color=” src=” background_position=’top left’ background_repeat=’no-repeat’ animation=”]

[av_heading heading=’Danger to press freedom’ tag=’h3′ style=’blockquote modern-quote’ size=” subheading_active=’subheading_below’ subheading_size=’15’ padding=’10’ color=” custom_font=” av-medium-font-size-title=” av-small-font-size-title=” av-mini-font-size-title=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” admin_preview_bg=”]
EDITORIAL
[/av_heading]

[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” admin_preview_bg=”]
January 17, 2018
[/av_textblock]

[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” admin_preview_bg=”]
(We yield this space to the statement of Altermidya, a nationwide network of alternative media outfits, due to its significance. – Ed.)

THE DECISION to revoke the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration of online news site Rappler is deeply troubling.

The SEC decision is a serious danger to press freedom and freedom of expression, and was made amid such glaring indications of rising dictatorship as the threat of term extension with the impending Charter change, the No-Elections scenario, and the hasty approval of the extension of Martial Law in Mindanao. Before all this, President Rodrigo Duterte had repeatedly threatened certain media organizations that he deems critical of his administration.

The decision to suppress Rappler for supposedly violating the constitutional prohibition on foreign ownership of media can only be interpreted as part of a scheme to silence critical media and to instill fear among media practitioners committed to reporting the truth in behalf of transparency in the current regime, and to hold it to account.

The motive behind the revocation is also questionable in the context of the Duterte administration’s push for 100 percent ownership of public utilities and mass media through Charter change. We have always been supportive of the constitutional ban on foreign ownership of media, but will oppose its use to silence the press.

We urge our fellow media practitioners in both the alternative and corporate media to resist all forms of repression and attacks against press freedom as a vital part of our opposition to the Duterte regime’s march to tyranny and the suppression of everyone’s freedom.
[/av_textblock]

[/av_one_full]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here