IRAN HAS a new leader — essentially a continuation of the previous one, with his son now assuming the role. He has been described as a hardliner and was previously a powerful figure operating behind the scenes.
United States President Donald Trump can hardly complain about political dynasties. The US itself had the Adams father-and-son presidencies, followed much later by the Bush family.
His suggestion that he should be involved in selecting Iran’s next leader was simply absurd. While imposing terms after winning a war may be expected, humiliating a nation is another matter entirely — they will neither forget nor forgive.
Is the world ready for a Trump dynasty — Donald followed by Eric, and then Barron? Don’t laugh; it’s not a joke.
Playing a dangerous game
There are several photos circulating in the media showing children climbing and playing — images that, at first glance, might seem harmless. In reality, they are horrifying.
Taken near Qamishli, a city in Syria, the photos show children climbing on an unexploded missile. They appear fearless, but more likely, they are unaware of the danger.
What kind of logic allows this to happen? Surely, there must be a better way to secure such hazards. These are innocent children — no one should be placed at such risk. Think about it, Mr. Trump.
It’s a big red button
It may seem obvious that Iran should not possess an atomic bomb — but should any country?
Fewer than 10 nations currently have nuclear weapons. In three of them — Russia, China, and North Korea — control effectively rests in the hands of a single individual. Meanwhile, India and Pakistan, both nuclear-armed, frequently find themselves in conflict.
The paradox of nuclear weapons is that their destructive potential deters their use. An atomic war would likely annihilate everything, creating a fragile peace enforced by fear.
The latest conflict, framed by this threat, involves President Trump’s offensive against Iran. Such actions are typically subject to congressional approval, yet Trump appears to have bypassed that process, acting on authority he may have simply assumed.
There must be a better path — one that involves reducing or eliminating these weapons and pursuing genuine peace, rather than relying on fear as a deterrent. However, it is doubtful such a path will be found if the approach remains one of bombing others into submission.
A bit of horse sense?
Recent developments from the royal circle have raised eyebrows. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has reportedly been banned from riding horses, while his daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie, have been barred from attending horse-riding events at Ascot.
Andrew’s ban stems from his association with Epstein — allegations he has consistently denied. His daughters, however, face restrictions simply due to their association with him, despite not being accused of any wrongdoing.
The situation appears more like a matter of convenience than a fair reprimand. It would be particularly distressing for Princess Anne — an avid horse enthusiast who remains free of controversy and continues to carry out her royal duties.
The late Queen would likely be turning in her grave at the family’s continued presence in such headlines./PN
