PECO calls on MORE Power: ‘LET’S NOT COLLECT FROM CONSUMERS’

“Our legal battle continues but let us show compassion and stand together in these trying times,” says Panay Electric Co. Head of Public Engagement and Government Affairs Marcelo Cacho, pointing out that with the enhanced community quarantine being extended until May 15 due to the raging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, people and businesses adversely affected are having difficulty paying their electricity bills. IAN PAUL CORDERO/PN
“Our legal battle continues but let us show compassion and stand together in these trying times,” says Panay Electric Co. Head of Public Engagement and Government Affairs Marcelo Cacho, pointing out that with the enhanced community quarantine being extended until May 15 due to the raging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, people and businesses adversely affected are having difficulty paying their electricity bills. IAN PAUL CORDERO/PN

Cacho: Better wait until COVID-19 crisis eases

ILOILO City – To help power consumers during this time of economic uncertainty, Panay Electric Co. (PECO) announced it won’t be collecting payments for power bills for the period of March onwards, until the current health crisis eases and the pending legal issues with MORE Electric and Power Corp. (MORE) have been clarified.

MORE Power should do the same, said PECO Head of Public Engagement and Government Affairs Marcelo Cacho, pointing out that with the enhanced community quarantine being extended until May 15 due to the raging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, people and businesses adversely affected are having difficulty paying their electricity bills.

PECO will continue to send billing statements so that customers can keep track of their consumption, but the company urges them to hold off on paying for the time being.

Customers may, however, continue to pay PECO for the February billing cycle.

“It has already become too difficult for consumers, so we will not be collecting payments until the courts’ and regulators’’ decisions are clear,” said Cacho. “We have to respect the law and the law has not yet decided. I suggest that MORE Power do the same thing — that is, to not collect payments because the courts have not yet decided on the case. It is not fair to the consumers.”

Cacho was referring to the pending clarification with the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) regarding the status of both companies’ Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN).

MORE was granted a Provisional Authority, but it was revealed in a March 5 hearing by ERC Hearing Officer Atty. Ma. Corazon Gines that MORE had not officially been granted a CPCN by the ERC.

Moreover, according to Cacho, Judge Emerald Contreras of the Iloilo Regional Trial Court’s Branch 23 issued an addendum to the Writ of Possession used by MORE Power to takeover PECO’s substations stating that operations are to be strictly maintained by PECO personnel.

This addendum was reiterated twice, once on March 2 and again on March 6.

This information was also not supplied to the ERC prior to the March 5 hearing, said Cacho.

MORE Power also previously claimed that it had been supplying power through its own contracts since early March. However, it had only officially registered with the Independent Electricity Market Operator of the Philippines Inc. (IEMOP) on March 26, said Cacho.

The company had tried to collect payments for the March billing cycle despite PECO’s continuous purchase of power for Iloilo City, added Cacho.

“Paying for bills is the last thing anyone should have to worry about given the current public health crisis. There is much more going on that needs attention,” said Cacho. “Our legal battle continues but let us show compassion and stand together in these trying times.”/PN

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here